Which court case established reasonable suspicion for stops?

Which court case established reasonable suspicion for stops?

• A. State v. Reynolds
• B. State v. Anderson
• C. Photo Array
• D. Computer Generated Photo Arrays

Answer: (B)

Reasonable suspicion for a stop rests on the officer having specific, articulable facts that would lead a reasonable person to suspect criminal activity. In New Jersey, State v. Anderson is the case that formalizes this standard, reinforcing that a stop is permissible only when the totality of the circumstances supports an articulate suspicion of wrongdoing. The other options don’t address the justification for stopping someone: Photo Array and Computer Generated Photo Arrays concern identification procedures after an encounter, not the legality of a stop. State v. Reynolds isn’t the case that established the stop standard in this context. So State v. Anderson is the best answer because it directly governs when a police stop is justified under the reasonable-suspicion standard.

Reasonable suspicion for a stop rests on the officer having specific, articulable facts that would lead a reasonable person to suspect criminal activity. In New Jersey, State v. Anderson is the case that formalizes this standard, reinforcing that a stop is permissible only when the totality of the circumstances supports an articulate suspicion of wrongdoing. The other options don’t address the justification for stopping someone: Photo Array and Computer Generated Photo Arrays concern identification procedures after an encounter, not the legality of a stop. State v. Reynolds isn’t the case that established the stop standard in this context. So State v. Anderson is the best answer because it directly governs when a police stop is justified under the reasonable-suspicion standard.